The New York case, filed in the Eastern District, follows a different script but the same logic, according to GEICO. There, the insurer is chasing more than $404,000 from four durable medical equipment suppliers – Hollis Healing Pro, Medi Casa, Enternational Services and 28 Supplies – and the individuals said to stand behind them. The merchandise at the center of the dispute is the kind that has drawn scrutiny in the No-Fault space: pulsed electromagnetic therapy devices described as infrared heating pads, pneumatic compression units, sustained acoustic medicine devices and off-the-shelf back, knee and shoulder braces. GEICO argues the equipment was “medically unnecessary, illusory, and otherwise non-reimbursable.”
